Opinions

Have we stopped believing in ‘Unity in Diversity’?

I once heard an urban legend that when White Americans first heard Elvis Presley on radio, they assumed him to be a black man because of his obvious Black influence. When word got around that Elvis was actually a White dude, there was a marked increase in his popularity.

While I have not been able to verify this claim in any article about his initial rise to popularity, it intrigued me all the same. Is it true that we gravitate towards art and entertainment created by those whom we deem to be our own? Is our choice in entertainment media just an exercise in jingoism?

This is a very depressing thought. Do we take our differences so seriously that the merit of the art matters so little to us?

I liked Ahaa and found Kanda Naal Mudhal passably entertaining. But in general, I found that my Brahmin friends like both movies a lot more than I do. The church wedding scene at the climax of Minnale certainly put a smile on my lips as church weddings were not depicted very convincingly until then. It probably makes a difference only if you are familiar with church music. And all this is in a very forgettable movie which had not convinced me to be invested in the characters at all.

We all love it when an actor gets our dialect right. Vairamuthu consistently used the names of cities and towns in his lyrics as people got much attached to those songs. So we got ‘thenmerku paruva kaatru Theni pakkam veesum pothu‘ and ‘Maanamadurai mamara kilaiyilea’. We adore it when our specific culture is depicted on screen. This is the closest most of us are going to get to seeing ourselves on the big screen.

I strongly remember thinking “A woman wrote Vaseegara? So that is why it sounded so refreshingly different.

All this variety seems to have come only after Barathiraja burst into the scene. Movies pretended that caste did not exist and only class distinction existed at all. They always seemed so whitewashed to remove all traces of caste. This is of course based on my own reading of Black & White movies. I am not all that knowledgeable about movies.

But we need more variety. The movie making elite should never be a homogenous group. We need more directors, writers and lyricists who come from minority populations.

We need more Muslim directors. The movie scene is incomplete when such a large group of people are represented only as foil and not as their own agents. I have never seen a nice rom-com with a Muslim Jodi. I have never seen a casual scene where a Muslim woman wakes her son up saying that he is too lazy and should not be late to the mosque. We don’t see their life. And it really is high time, no?

All this yearnings for heterogeneous movies does not make the reduction of someone’s taste in Maniratnam and/or Kamalhassan movies to merely sharing their caste, any less absurd.

I mean, I’d have understood it if they were 2 obscure filmmakers long forgotten by the general public. But Maniratnam? And Kamalhassan?

Consider the Illayaraja top 100 albums that I collected as a tribute. A good 40+ songs of the 100 pictured as screenshots can be tracked back to K.Balachander, Maniratnam, Kamalhassan or the very prolific Vaali. Would I have been called casteist or classist for the very same choice had I been a Brahmin? It just doesn’t seem right.

We don’t think of class when we call 2 friends a “Deva-Surya” pair. We don’t think of caste when we use a “Nee Azhaga Irukanu Nenaikala” quote. On the same note, we don’t think of Vadivelu’s caste or Goundamani’s caste while laughing at a Kaipulla joke or All-in-all Alagaraja quote.

Caste is not continually on our minds while we interact with each other unless we permit some people to deposit poison in us. We need to learn to give space to a truly heterogeneous group of filmmakers without taking away from the achievements of those who came before them.

24 thoughts on “Have we stopped believing in ‘Unity in Diversity’?”

  1. I don’t know if maybe the whitewashing was just better. Scratch that, it’s a silly thought, but the older I get, the less tolerant I am of intolerance. Wasn’t Kamal a surefire box office draw for so very long? Just can’t relate to the hate; they make it sound like the Brahmins put him on a pedestal and masked his severe flaws and as if all his hits were just fake news.

    Interestingly, Bollywood was and still is caste blind but the Muslim social was a big genre in Bollywood for a long time. Unfortunately it died when Shakti Samanta and Hrishida replaced ghazals with bhadralok music. In the 50s and 60s, the actors had to bear Hindu names for saleability even if they were Muslim but films around Muslim life were made. For the last nearly three decades, the Three Khans have dominated but bear Hindu names and the Muslim social is mostly gone (though I heard Raees was a retread).

    Liked by 1 person

  2. As my knowledge of Hindi cinema tends towards zero, I did not know that.

    All this recent hate is just weird. People said Rajini was fun and massy, Kamal was talented and classy. But caste was never ever brought into the discussion.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Rahini, Blaise Pascal once said that (I’m paraphrasing) that man can never do so much evil as when he does it out of religious conviction.

    In today’s age, people are using religion – and the complementary caste/class angle – to sow discord. The use of social media allows them to disperse their views to a large number of people with little effect.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Beautifully expressed, and very articulate, Rahini.

    I feel so fortunate to be living in a state where there is so little caste based (or even religion based) hatred.

    Like

  5. Very well written, Rahini. As you wrote, it’s very fair to enjoy something because we relate it to our personal background. In ‘Rhythm,’ there is a scene where Lakshmi says, “nee thaligai-la poondu vengayam elaam shethupiyo no…naan shethuka maaten.” That scene made me smile for the authentic detail of poondu and vengaayam being grouped together by an elderly lady. That’s exactly how my Paati would talk to me when I returned home from chaat at Gangothree. And as you said, the more heterogeneous the filmmakers are, the more variety we have in the films. And as someone said of Satyajit Ray’s work (I am paraphrasing here), the more ethnic and rooted he got, the more global he went.

    Like

  6. From what little I can understand, there was this period when a sizeable number of Indian kids who grew up being educated in the 90s started to gradually move away from their parents’ deep affliction towards religion/caste. Cut to year 2006. Twitter was launched in July and Facebook was opened to the general public in September of that year. It then took only a mere 3 to 4 years for almost all internet using Indians to really get the grip of the schematics and the reach these two platforms offered. This is when the religious/casteist viruses really started to spread again and multiply with breakneck pace. And then came the vulture WhatsApp. Launched exclusively for iPhone users in 2009, the app ventured into Android space in 2010. The rest, as they say, is history. Everything went haywire from there.

    And yes, we, as a country seem to have stopped believing in unity. We have fast become an intolerant society, living in virtual communities fenced with caste and religion. Very sad, isn’t it?

    Liked by 2 people

  7. It is sad. Negative thoughts are easily grasped and positives take time to permeate. So I wanted to say that social media is a toy and kids will grow out of it, but the horror is this TOY will get new kids all the time. Dang.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Brilliant article, Rahini!

    The paragraph beseeching for a Muslim story from a Muslim POV, is so long overdue! In the context of Tamil Films, that and LGBT folks talking about their lives is also needed. Else, we should be thankful to Tamil Films for playing such an outstanding role in shaping up the society of today. Lots of positives, and some significant negatives too.

    Then, that last sentence – “We need to learn to give space to a truly heterogeneous group of filmmakers without taking away from the achievements of those who came before them.”

    So very profound this!

    Like

  9. Thank you Natarajan. I very much agree.

    I remember seeing a comment war under a Barathanatyam performance and thinking how people saw the art form itself as a bad thing as traditionally higher caste people had exclusive access to the arts. These resentments are partly because of their own personal experience of being snubbed by the current high-classes.

    But I feel they should be seen as Indian art forms and not high caste art forms. I guess children of all castes participating in these arts will slowly erase away that divide. But will that happen? Will a Dalit father send his daughter to a Brahmin teacher to learn dance? Will he feel that she will be facing unfair discrimination? Will the teachers be taking her in with open arms. I have many questions about these, but I really don’t know how to find out.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment